Practical disciplinary literacy
Co-plan and observe the routine
Use complementary expertise and a focused observation question.
A worked school example
Subject teacher specifies reasoning and success criteria; EAL teacher examines language demands.
Both rehearse the model, plan learner roles and decide who gathers evidence.
Record the learner response and support given, rather than rate the teacher.
This is a suggested local planning example, not a school rating or an official EEF implementation tool.
Put it into practice
- Choose one lesson and agree the subject outcome, language move and independent exit response.
- Allocate modelling, checking and observation roles in advance; avoid a default helper role for the EAL teacher.
- Observe a small planned sample: what reasoning was visible, which prompt was used and what changed after it?
- Compare notes and agree one adjustment for the next lesson.
Build your working record
Adapt and keep your resource
Edit these fields for your class or department. Drafts stay in this browser; use anonymised evidence. Download an editable text copy to keep it elsewhere.
Questions for a useful team conversation
“What did the learner do independently, and what support made a difference?”
Ask colleagues to bring a concrete task or response, explain one judgement and identify uncertainty. Invite learner perspectives without treating comments alone as attainment evidence.
Keep implementation proportionate
Start with one unit and a manageable sample of work. Use existing meetings and curriculum records where possible. Agree essential practice while allowing subject-specific representations and examples.
Avoid fixed promises about attainment or CEFR gains. Review access, reasoning, language and independence separately.
Open the existing whole-school planner