Check whether a scaffold enables independent performance.
Science: after a cause-and-effect frame, give a new result and retain only because. Then check whether the explanation still names the mechanism.
Choose an existing scaffold and identify the independent performance it is meant to enable.
State the intended learning, separate from completing the scaffold.
Use the support with one example and check its value.
Try a fresh example with one part of the support removed.
Restore only the support needed, or fade it further if independence holds.
Remove one component at a time and judge from a new response.
Keep the subject challenge. Offer one model, visual or language prompt where needed, then check a fresh independent response.
Choose an existing scaffold and identify the independent performance it is meant to enable.
State the intended learning, separate from completing the scaffold. Use the support with one example and check its value.
Compare supported and less-supported responses for meaning, not just fluency.
Remove one component at a time and judge from a new response.
Compare supported and less-supported responses for meaning, not just fluency.
Adapt these prompts to the task and your learners.
Our purpose is: Check whether a scaffold enables independent performance.
Which detail supports your explanation? Show me how you know.
Try the new case on your own. Show the detail or reasoning that supports your answer.
Which support do you still need, and which part can you now do independently?
Maths: remove worked steps while retaining the problem representation.
Humanities: remove argument headings after checking paragraph structure.
Use a small word bank, visuals and partner rehearsal when needed. Extend with precise explanations and qualifications. Judge the support from the response to this task.
Keep the strategy. Change the subject.
Remove a full causal frame on a changed force diagram, retaining only “because”.
The object accelerates upwards because the upward force is greater than the downward force.
Use a changed example without the original frame; restore a lighter support if the reasoning breaks down.
Remove paragraph headings on a new source judgement.
The poster’s direct address supports a persuasive purpose, but it cannot establish the audience’s response.
Use a changed example without the original frame; restore a lighter support if the reasoning breaks down.
Remove an interpretation frame and ask for analysis of a new word.
“Whispered” may create a secretive atmosphere by suggesting speech intended for few listeners.
Use a changed example without the original frame; restore a lighter support if the reasoning breaks down.
Remove the worked solution but keep the problem representation.
I calculated the distance change and divided it by elapsed time, obtaining 2 m/s.
Use a changed example without the original frame; restore a lighter support if the reasoning breaks down.