Correct Less, Improve More
Prioritise a meaningful improvement instead of correcting every surface error at once.
Worked model: Correct Less, Improve More
View the illustrated activity card
- 1Prioritise a meaningful improvement instead of correcting every surface error at once
- 2Name one gap the learner can act on
- 3Show or discuss how to improve that gap
- 4Require a revised response and a fresh attempt to check transfer
Instead of “add detail”, write “Name the resultant force and connect it to acceleration.” The learner revises “It goes faster” into an explanation of the force relationship.
Teach the move
Prepare · 5 minutes
Select one learner response and one improvement that matters for its meaning.
- 1
Prioritise a meaningful improvement instead of correcting every surface error at once.
- 2
Name one gap the learner can act on.
- 3
Show or discuss how to improve that gap.
- 4
Require a revised response and a fresh attempt to check transfer.
EAL upgrade
Move from a full correction to a question, then to a learner-selected self-check.
Keep the subject challenge. Offer one model, visual or language prompt where needed, then check a fresh independent response.
Try it tomorrow
Select one learner response and one improvement that matters for its meaning.
Prioritise a meaningful improvement instead of correcting every surface error at once. Name one gap the learner can act on.
Check the new example, not only whether the original correction was copied.
Move from a full correction to a question, then to a learner-selected self-check.
What to look for
Check the new example, not only whether the original correction was copied.
Teacher language
Adapt these prompts to the task and your learners.
Our purpose is: Prioritise a meaningful improvement instead of correcting every surface error at once.
Show the relationship and explain the choice you made.
Try the new case on your own. Show the detail or reasoning that supports your answer.
Which support do you still need, and which part can you now do independently?
Across subjects
Maths: identify the missing justification. Humanities: identify the unsupported claim or missing source link.
Adjust language support
Use a small word bank, visuals and partner rehearsal when needed. Extend with precise explanations and qualifications. Judge the support from the response to this task.