Source Reliability Check
Before reading two sources with dates and authors, pre-teach at most two essential terms. Learners annotate one useful detail and write a one-sentence takeaway.
Worked classroom example
Geography
For Source Reliability Check in Geography, give learners a short source extract about fieldwork methods. Ask them to separate what the source states from what the reader infers and name the clue that supports the judgement. Model how to mark the exact word, phrase, label or value that supports the response, then distinguish that evidence from any inference.
Use this example to make the language move visible. Select subject content appropriate to the class’s age and prior knowledge.
Teaching sequence
- Choose two sources with dates and authors from the current Geography unit. Set one question for Source Reliability Check and model how to locate a relevant feature without supplying the answer.
- Learners complete Source Reliability Check: Separate what the source states from what the reader infers and name the clue that supports the judgement. Ask them to mark the exact evidence they used, then compare the evidence and interpretation with a partner.
- Use this check: “Which exact detail in the source supports that answer?” Have each learner apply the same reading move to a fresh section and give an independent answer supported by a source detail.
Materials and purpose
two sources with dates and authors
A purposeful reading move helps learners focus on meaning and evidence, while giving them a reason to return to the source.
Try it in your next lesson
Prepare
Use two sources with dates and authors. Choose a second example that checks the same language move without repeating the original answer.
Classroom task
Before reading two sources with dates and authors, pre-teach at most two essential terms. Learners annotate one useful detail and write a one-sentence takeaway.
Check independent transfer
Learners answer in a claim-plus-evidence sentence and explain how reliable or relevant the evidence is.
Collect a response on fresh content. Note what was achieved without the model, partner or teacher prompt, then choose one next teaching step.
Teacher language
Teacher language
Which exact detail in the source supports that answer?
“What does the source actually say, and what are you inferring?”
“What cannot be concluded from this evidence alone?”
Respond to the learner
Identify one successful meaning or language choice. Ask about one gap, allow thinking time, then invite a revision. Check the revised move again on a fresh example.
Adjust support and challenge
Offer a brief model, useful vocabulary and partner rehearsal where needed. Keep the subject goal; reduce one prompt on fresh content and record what was independent.
Teaching this skill → · Age and language support →
More support
Chunk the source, gloss essential terms and model one evidence selection. Keep the question’s reasoning demand. Allow familiar-language notes or another response mode when checking subject understanding.
Greater independence
Change the content, evidence or audience. Remove the completed model and ask learners to explain a choice. Increase subject complexity only when it fits the curriculum and prior knowledge.
Choose the next step
If subject meaning is insecure, reteach the concept. If the concept is understood but the English is unclear, model one useful language relationship and invite a fresh response.