Skip to content

Use headings, a short model and a language frame; allow paired rehearsal before an independent response. Adapt the scaffold to what the learner can already do.

Routines that make support part of everyday teaching

Classroom systems for EAL support.

Build language support into planning, modelling, assessment, feedback and multilingual participation. Use these routines consistently, then reduce support as learners become more independent.

planning · systems

Plan the representation and the language demand

Decide how learners will move between concrete or visual representations, notation and explanation.

Try this: For an equation lesson, align the balance model, written equation and spoken explanation.

Worked example

Content: preserve equality. Language: justify doing the same operation to both sides.

Teaching sequence
  1. Choose a representation that reveals the relationship.
  2. Model the words alongside the notation.
  3. Check transfer to a new equation.

What to look for: The scaffold reveals the mathematics without doing the thinking for the learner.

routines · systems

Use a consistent problem-solving routine

Make the routine a way to understand relationships, rather than a checklist of keywords.

Try this: Use read → represent → solve → explain → check across different problem types.

Worked example

A bar model clarifies which quantity is unknown before an operation is chosen.

Teaching sequence
  1. Ask learners to identify the unknown.
  2. Require a representation and a reason.
  3. Check whether the result makes sense in context.

What to look for: A learner can explain and validate the solution.

assessment · systems

Distinguish language difficulty from mathematical misconception

Ask for a diagram, manipulation or short oral explanation as well as written working when diagnosing a difficulty.

Try this: A learner misreads fewer than but can solve the same relationship shown in a diagram.

Worked example

The follow-up task targets relational language; the learner still receives appropriately challenging mathematics.

Teaching sequence
  1. Compare two representations of the same concept.
  2. Identify whether the error is conceptual, procedural or linguistic.
  3. Use the formal assessment rules for the final assessed task.

What to look for: The next teaching step responds to the actual difficulty.

feedback · systems

Make an error something to explain

Use an incorrect example to prompt reasoning. Avoid feedback that only replaces one number with another.

Try this: A learner writes 3x + 4 = 19, then 3x = 23.

Worked example

Subtracting 4 from both sides gives 15. Explain which operation preserves equality and why.

Teaching sequence
  1. Locate the first point where the reasoning changes.
  2. Ask the learner to explain and correct that step.
  3. Test the correction on a fresh equation.

What to look for: The revision shows the principle, not just the corrected answer.

multilingual · systems

Compare terms while keeping notation stable

Invite learners to explain a concept in a language they know, then connect it to English notation and the required explanation.

Try this: Compare how learners describe ratio or a fraction, without assuming direct word-for-word equivalents.

Worked example

A learner sketches the relationship, names it in English and explains it with an example.

Teaching sequence
  1. Keep the diagram and notation visible.
  2. Clarify the English term in context.
  3. Ask for an independent explanation using the shared representation.

What to look for: Students move between languages and representations with mathematical meaning intact.