Skip to content

Use headings, a short model and a language frame; allow paired rehearsal before an independent response. Adapt the scaffold to what the learner can already do.

Routines that make support part of everyday teaching

Classroom systems for EAL support.

Build language support into planning, modelling, assessment, feedback and multilingual participation. Use these routines consistently, then reduce support as learners become more independent.

planning · systems

Plan practical access before the equipment comes out

Make procedure, safety language, variables and the learning goal visible in advance. Follow your school’s laboratory safety and risk-assessment requirements.

Try this: Prepare a short visual method with action verbs, equipment labels and checks for understanding.

Worked example

Students can identify the changed variable, measured outcome and controlled conditions before beginning.

Teaching sequence
  1. Pre-teach essential procedural and safety language.
  2. Model one step and ask learners to explain it back.
  3. Check understanding before independent practical work.

What to look for: Learners can describe the procedure and demonstrate safe actions.

routines · systems

Use an observation-to-explanation routine

Keep doing the practical separate from explaining it. Build in a short language checkpoint after a meaningful observation.

Try this: Use observe → record → compare → explain → evaluate.

Worked example

A student records a result with its unit, compares it with another trial, then explains the pattern and a limitation.

Teaching sequence
  1. Record observations before interpretation.
  2. Use a table or labelled diagram to compare.
  3. Require an evidence-based explanation.

What to look for: The learner can trace a conclusion back to recorded evidence.

assessment · systems

Diagnose the concept and the language separately

Use drawings, sorting, explanation and written responses to locate difficulties before deciding on support.

Try this: Ask a learner to sort examples of balanced and unbalanced forces, then explain one choice.

Worked example

A correct sorting response with a weak written answer suggests a language need; an incorrect model needs conceptual teaching too.

Teaching sequence
  1. Check the scientific model through an accessible representation.
  2. Identify the language of the required response.
  3. Use the formal assessment’s marking and access requirements.

What to look for: The next task targets the identified need while preserving subject challenge.

feedback · systems

Give the next scientific language move

Focus on an evidence link, a unit, a comparison, a condition or a distinction between observation and explanation.

Try this: Revise an unsupported claim in a conclusion.

Worked example

Replace It worked better with a comparison using the measured result and explain what better means in this investigation.

Teaching sequence
  1. Name one strength in the science.
  2. Model one precise revision.
  3. Ask the learner to apply the same move to another result.

What to look for: Feedback leads to a clearer scientific claim.

multilingual · systems

Use a language bridge around the model

Allow brief multilingual meaning-making while keeping scientific diagrams, quantities and units visible.

Try this: Pairs explain a process in a shared language, then prepare an English diagram caption.

Worked example

Students test their meaning against the scientific representation before selecting the English terms.

Teaching sequence
  1. Set a focused question and time window.
  2. Build a short English explanation from the discussion.
  3. Check individual understanding with a new example.

What to look for: The English response represents the scientific idea accurately.