Skip to content
EAL teaching portal · know the learner’s language profile

What can this learner do?

Explore A1–C2 language profiles and see how the same subject task can be accessed and expressed with different levels of English support.

Language proficiency is a profile, not a label for ability.

A learner may read at one level, speak at another and need extra support with a new subject genre. Prior schooling, topic knowledge, task familiarity and available support also affect a response. Low English proficiency does not imply low subject understanding.

The language summaries below are brief paraphrases informed by the Council of Europe CEFR. The subject examples and teacher moves are classroom adaptations. Do not assign a level from a single sample, use these examples as an exam rubric, or turn the levels into automatic curriculum or placement thresholds.

Keep the thinking visible.

These fictional tasks stay recognisably the same across levels. Vary the language support and expected English response, rather than assuming that a learner with less English needs less interesting subject work.

SubjectShared task and evidence
HumanitiesA fictional poster says Everyone supports the plan. A fictional survey reports support from half its respondents. Compare the claims, their purposes and what further evidence is needed.
MathsCompare two ways of calculating 25 × 16: 25 × 8 + 25 × 8, and one quarter of 100 × 16. Both give 400. Explain why each works.
ScienceIn fictional observations, a solid dissolves in 60 seconds at 20°C and 30 seconds at 40°C. Describe the pattern and discuss what would be needed to evaluate a temperature effect.

Choose a level and subject.

A1

Supported first steps in English

Recognises familiar language and communicates basic messages with substantial help.

Reading

Recognise familiar words and short, simple messages.

Listening

Understand familiar language when speech is slow and clear.

Speaking

Use basic phrases; interact with a helpful partner.

Writing

Write familiar words and simple personal statements.

What the same subject task might look like

Humanities

Poster: “all”. Survey: “half”. Not the same.

Maths

Both answers: 400. Same answer. Different ways.

Science

Warm water: 30 seconds. Cool water: 60 seconds.

Illustrative supported classroom responses, written for this portal. These are not validated CEFR scoring samples.

Teacher moves

Use labelled visuals, a small word bank, modelling, pointing and oral rehearsal. Check understanding through representations as well as English.

Let learners point, match, label or select an example, then model a short English response. The diagram or calculation can remain intellectually demanding.

A possible next language move: Build a short meaningful phrase into a simple sentence; reduce one prompt when the learner is ready.

A2

Simple connected classroom messages

Handles familiar situations and communicates straightforward information in simple language.

Reading

Find predictable information in short, accessible texts.

Listening

Catch key information in short, clear messages.

Speaking

Exchange routine information and give simple descriptions.

Writing

Produce short messages and simple linked sentences.

What the same subject task might look like

Humanities

The poster says everyone agrees, but the survey says half. The poster may want support.

Maths

Both methods give 400. One method uses 200 plus 200. The other uses 100 times 4.

Science

The solid dissolved faster in warm water. It took 30 seconds, not 60.

Illustrative supported classroom responses, written for this portal. These are not validated CEFR scoring samples.

Teacher moves

Use short chunks, accessible headings, sentence starters and rehearsal. Model a small number of useful relationships.

Keep the same evidence available. Ask for a simple comparison, sequence or explanation, using a frame where needed.

A possible next language move: Link a point to a reason or example and ask a follow-up question.

B1

Connected explanation on familiar content

Understands the main points of clear familiar input and gives connected explanations.

Reading

Read straightforward texts on familiar interests or topics.

Listening

Follow main points in clear speech on familiar matters.

Speaking

Explain experiences or views and give brief reasons.

Writing

Write connected text on familiar topics.

What the same subject task might look like

Humanities

The poster tries to persuade people that the plan has support. However, only half the survey respondents agreed, so the sources give different impressions.

Maths

Both methods are correct: 25 × 8 + 25 × 8 = 400, and a quarter of 100 × 16 is also 400. The second method is quick when I notice that 25 is a quarter of 100.

Science

The solid dissolved in 30 seconds at 40°C, compared with 60 seconds at 20°C. This suggests that temperature affected dissolving time, but we should repeat the test.

Illustrative supported classroom responses, written for this portal. These are not validated CEFR scoring samples.

Teacher moves

Offer paragraph plans, headings and focused vocabulary. Rehearse the evidence link before an independent response.

Ask for a connected response with a clear point, an evidence detail and an explanation. Use familiar subject content to diagnose the language demand.

A possible next language move: Develop the explanation, select stronger evidence and distinguish a claim from a limitation.

B2

Developed explanation and supported judgement

Handles complex ideas and produces clear, developed responses, including arguments and comparisons.

Reading

Follow arguments and viewpoints in more complex texts.

Listening

Follow extended speech and developed argument in accessible contexts.

Speaking

Participate actively and develop a supported point of view.

Writing

Write clear, detailed text and explain arguments.

What the same subject task might look like

Humanities

The poster’s universal claim is not supported by the survey, which reports agreement from half its respondents. Its persuasive purpose may explain the contrast, although the survey sample also needs checking.

Maths

Partitioning uses distributivity: 25(8 + 8) = 200 + 200. The other method rescales 25 as 100/4, giving 100 × 4. Both are equivalent; efficiency depends on which numerical relationship is easiest to recognise.

Science

Dissolving time was lower at 40°C than at 20°C in these observations. The difference supports a possible temperature effect, but repeat trials and consistent stirring are needed before drawing a stronger conclusion.

Illustrative supported classroom responses, written for this portal. These are not validated CEFR scoring samples.

Teacher moves

Use targeted models for evidence, organisation, stance and qualification. Avoid assuming that fluent conversation guarantees control of every subject genre.

Ask learners to justify a choice or interpretation and address a relevant limitation. Check subject accuracy separately from the quality of the English argument.

A possible next language move: Improve precision, synthesis and the handling of exceptions or competing interpretations.

C1

Precise, flexible academic expression

Handles demanding language and expresses complex ideas with organised, flexible and precise language.

Reading

Interpret demanding texts, including implied meaning.

Listening

Follow complex discourse and less explicit relationships.

Speaking

Express complex ideas flexibly and with sustained organisation.

Writing

Produce well-structured text with controlled cohesion and register.

What the same subject task might look like

Humanities

The contrast concerns both the scale and purpose of the claims: the poster presents unanimity, whereas the survey reports a proportion of respondents. The discrepancy challenges the poster’s wording, but not necessarily every aspect of its message.

Maths

The two solutions exploit different structures of the same product: distributivity in one case and proportional rescaling in the other. Their equivalence is secure, while their practical efficiency depends on the solver’s recognition of those structures.

Science

The observations are consistent with a temperature-related reduction in dissolving time. However, the apparent effect cannot be isolated confidently without evidence that other influential conditions were controlled and the pattern replicated.

Illustrative supported classroom responses, written for this portal. These are not validated CEFR scoring samples.

Teacher moves

Target specialist genre conventions, unfamiliar terminology and nuanced evidence links. Use feedback that sharpens an already substantial response.

Require synthesis or qualification where the subject task calls for it. Offer subject-specific support without treating advanced general English as complete disciplinary expertise.

A possible next language move: Refine precision and select an economical form suited to the audience and disciplinary purpose.

C2

Nuanced and economical communication

Understands demanding language and communicates fine distinctions fluently, precisely and coherently.

Reading

Synthesize demanding texts and distinguish subtle differences.

Listening

Understand demanding speech, allowing familiarisation with unfamiliar accents.

Speaking

Express nuanced meaning and adapt flexibly to the situation.

Writing

Produce precise, fluent text suited to a complex purpose.

What the same subject task might look like

Humanities

The survey contradicts the poster’s claim of unanimity among its respondents; it does not establish the wider population’s view. Evaluating either source therefore requires attention to purpose, scope and representativeness.

Maths

Both calculations preserve the product, one through distribution and the other through rescaling. The useful comparison is not correctness but the ease with which each representation exposes a calculable structure.

Science

The observed difference motivates a hypothesis about temperature; it does not, on its own, establish causation. Replication under controlled conditions would help distinguish a temperature effect from other explanations.

Illustrative supported classroom responses, written for this portal. These are not validated CEFR scoring samples.

Teacher moves

Use expert feedback on the disciplinary argument, evidence, audience and rhetorical choices. Advanced proficiency does not remove the need to teach new subject knowledge.

Ask for precise, audience-appropriate judgement grounded in evidence. A concise explanation may be more successful than a long one.

A possible next language move: Refine the response for purpose and audience, rather than making it longer or more ornate.

Turn observation into a teaching decision.

  1. Start with what the learner already understands about the subject.
  2. Use tasks that sample reception, interaction and production, with clear instructions.
  3. Record the support provided, so a prompted response is not treated as independent performance.
  4. Look for a pattern across several observations and compare with the relevant official descriptor scales.
  5. Choose one achievable language move and collect fresh evidence after teaching it.

At very early stages, include Pre-A1 descriptors and accessible participation options such as pointing, matching, gesture and supported phrases. The A1–C2 cards here do not replace the fuller descriptor scales. Speaking summaries combine aspects of interaction and production for orientation.

A skill-by-skill learner observation plan.

Use a learner or group code if needed. The level choices record your current working judgement; this tool does not calculate or certify a CEFR level.

Subject support hubsBeginner grammar teachingExam score equivalencies

Official references: CEFR Global Scale · Self-assessment grid · Companion volume and updated descriptors. Council of Europe. Subject adaptations by Duncan Rose.